logo
traditional values modern thinking traditional values modern thinking traditional values modern thinking traditional values modern thinking
go to individual servicesgo to business servicescall

Discrimination – Religion or Belief

16 May 2011

A committed Spiritualist has failed in his attempt to persuade the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) that his dismissal from the post of Special Constabulary Trainer was unlawful discrimination under the Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (Power v Greater Manchester Police Authority).

Alan Power started work for the Greater Manchester Police Authority on 6 October 2008. Shortly afterwards, his employer received complaints from two separate police training establishments, where he had volunteered his services as a role player prior to commencing his employment, concerning his behaviour and unhelpful attitude. A subsequent investigation revealed that Mr Power had provided other police forces with CDs and posters that were not considered compatible with his employment as they related to his personal interest in Spiritualism rather than to police business. His employment was terminated with immediate effect.

A preliminary hearing established that Mr Power’s beliefs did fall within the definition of a religious or philosophical belief for the purposes of protection under the Regulations. However, the Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the main reason he was dismissed was not because he held the protected belief but because his previous conduct as a volunteer indicated that he was not suitable to train young police officers. A contributing factor was the delivery of the posters and CDs which, although related to his belief in Spiritualism, constituted an unacceptable way of expressing his belief.

Mr Power appealed on the ground that his religious belief had, at least in part, contributed to the decision to dismiss him and he was therefore a victim of unlawful discrimination.

The EAT dismissed the appeal. In reaching its decision, the ET had followed the approach taken in earlier religious discrimination cases that a distinction can be drawn between treatment on the ground of a person’s belief and on the ground of a manifestation of that belief. On the facts of the case, it was entitled to find that the reason for Mr Power’s dismissal was, in part, the manifestation of his spiritual beliefs by way of the material he had earlier distributed, not the fact of his beliefs.

For more information on this subject or any other legal matter,
please contact us:

Tonbridge: 01732 770660
Sevenoaks: 01732 747900
Email: marketing@warners-solicitors.co.uk